Grant v. Richard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Grant v. Richard

222 A.D.2d 1014, 636 N.Y.S.2d 676, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14052

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 1995·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ motion in limine that sought to exclude potential testimony and documentary evidence in advance of trial. The decision regarding the admissibility of evidence should await the trial, when the determination may be made "in context” (Speed v Avis Rent-A-Car, 172 AD2d 267, 268). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Gossel, J. — Preclude Testimony.) Present — Pine, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ motion in limine that sought to exclude potential testimony and documentary evidence in advance of trial. The decision regarding the admissibility of evidence should await the trial, when the determination may be made "in context” (Speed v Avis Rent-A-Car, 172 AD2d 267, 268). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Gossel, J. — Preclude Testimony.) Present — Pine, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Grant v. Richard, 222 A.D.2d 1014, 636 N.Y.S.2d 676, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14052 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

222 A.D.2d 1014 (Grant v. Richard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related