Grant v. Potts

Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas

Grant v. Potts

2 Miles 164

CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

DecidedDecember 5, 1837

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Miles 164 (Grant v. Potts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grant v. Potts, 2 Miles 164 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1837).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.—

We decided in Davies v. Scott, (ante 52.) that the plaintiff might issue a capias ad satisfaciendum, fieri facias and attachment of execution simultaneously, but that one only could be enforced, and that if more than one of these writs should be served, the defendant might elect which should stand, and that the other, or others, should be set aside. Here the defendants have elected that the attachment-execution should remain, and have asked that the service of the fieri facias should be set aside. The rule must be made absolute.

Rule absolute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.—

We decided in Davies v. Scott, (ante 52.) that the plaintiff might issue a capias ad satisfaciendum, fieri facias and attachment of execution simultaneously, but that one only could be enforced, and that if more than one of these writs should be served, the defendant might elect which should stand, and that the other, or others, should be set aside. Here the defendants have elected that the attachment-execution should remain, and have asked that the service of the fieri facias should be set aside. The rule must be made absolute.

Rule absolute.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Miles 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grant-v-potts-pactcomplphilad-1837.