Grant v. New York State Division of Parole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Grant v. New York State Division of Parole

207 A.D.2d 927, 616 N.Y.S.2d 262, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8838

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 15, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 207 A.D.2d 927 (Grant v. New York State Division of Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grant v. New York State Division of Parole, 207 A.D.2d 927, 616 N.Y.S.2d 262, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Conway, J.), entered August 6, 1993 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent denying petitioner’s request for parole.

Petitioner, serving concurrent prison sentences of 5Vá to 16 years for his convictions of rape in the first degree and attempted murder in the second degree, was denied parole. Review of the parole hearing transcript satisfies us that respondent considered the relevant guidelines and that its decision was made pursuant to statutory requirements. We have considered petitioner’s other contentions and find them to be without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, Weiss and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Conway, J.), entered August 6, 1993 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent denying petitioner’s request for parole.

Petitioner, serving concurrent prison sentences of 5Vá to 16 years for his convictions of rape in the first degree and attempted murder in the second degree, was denied parole. Review of the parole hearing transcript satisfies us that respondent considered the relevant guidelines and that its decision was made pursuant to statutory requirements. We have considered petitioner’s other contentions and find them to be without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, Weiss and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 A.D.2d 927, 616 N.Y.S.2d 262, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grant-v-new-york-state-division-of-parole-nyappdiv-1994.