Grant v. Metropolitan Ice Co.
This text of 152 A. 924 (Grant v. Metropolitan Ice Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This writ brings up for review the judgment of the Common Pleas Court, upon an appeal from the findings of the workmen’s compensation bureau, affirming such finding.
The sole question presented appears to be that the finding that the accident arose out of and in the course of employment was not established by competent and sufficient proof, but was based entirely upon hearsay evidence.
Our examination of the proofs causes us to concur in this contention to the extent that in some large measure this is so, and necessarily so, but also that there was corroborative proof, more or less circumstantial, warranting and justifying the findings below upon this point.
The judgment below is therefore affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
152 A. 924, 9 N.J. Misc. 202, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grant-v-metropolitan-ice-co-nj-1931.