Grant v. Maine Sand & Gravel Co.
This text of 153 A. 905 (Grant v. Maine Sand & Gravel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Debt brought in the name of the tax collector to recover certain taxes alleged to have been legally assessed on the real estate of the defendant, for the respective municipal years of 1928 and 1929, in the town of Leeds.
Defendant pleaded the general issue with brief statement. The brief statement is not of importance.
The jury returned a verdict for defendant, by direction.
Plaintiff saved and has argued an exception.
The objection interposed to the recovery of the taxes was that prior to the commencement of this action, the collector had, in each year, enforced full collection of the tax by a sale of the property against which assessment had been laid. The proof established this. Moreover, it appeared in evidence that the collector had properly accounted for the proceeds of such sale.
So far as the particular taxes were concerned, they had been collected, and the duties of the collector ended before this action was begun. Exception overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
153 A. 905, 130 Me. 513, 1931 Me. LEXIS 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grant-v-maine-sand-gravel-co-me-1931.