Grant v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

Opinion

3 Case No.: 2:20-cv-01629-JAD-NJK Claude Grant, 5 laintiff Plainti Order Adopting Report & Recommendatio 6 and Dismissing Action v. 7 Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, 8 [ECF Nos. 14, 15, 41] 9 Defendant 10 11 On May 25, 2021, the magistrate judge entered a report and recommendation for this 12 court to dismiss and close this action based on the plaintiff’s failure to comply with court orders 13 despite the explicit warning that dismissal could result.! The deadline for any party to object to 14 that recommendation was June 8, 2020, and no party filed anything. “[N]o review is required of 15 a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”* Having reviewed 16 the R&R, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do. 17 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 18 Recommendation [ECF No. 41] is ADOPTED in its entirety. This action is DISMISSED, all 19 pending motions [ECF Nos. 14, 15] are DENIED as moot, and the Clerk of Court is directed to 20 ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and CLOSE THIS CASE. 21 <] a Jees*7 22 USS. District Res Dorsey 23 Dated: June 10, 2021 24 | 251]! ECF No. 41. 26 Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 97 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). 28