Grant v. Kinney

5 Ohio Law. Abs. 781
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Grant v. Kinney. Read the opinion of the Court — 117 Ohio St. 362
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 30, 1927·No. No. 20589·Published

Opinion

JONES, J.

A holder of a second mortgage instituted proceedings for its foreclosure. Thereafter and while the foreclosure was pending. Grant, a purchaser acquiring the mortgaged premises, verbally agreed with the second mortgagee, [782]*782that, if the latter would dismiss pending suit, pay the cost thereof and credit the second moitgag e notes with interest then accrued thereon, he, Grant, would pay the mortgagee the principal of an overdue mortgage note amounting to $500.00, and would assume the balance of the mortgage indebtedness with interest from the date of the mortgage indebtedness: Held; that such verbal promise made to the mortgagee was an original and not a collateral promise; it was made upon a sufficient consideration subserving a pecuniary purpose involving a benefit to the promisor and was within the statute of frauds.

Judgment affirmed.

(Marshall, CJ., Day, Allen, Kinkade and Matthias, JJ., concur.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grant v. Kinney, 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 781 (Ohio 1927).

5 Ohio Law. Abs. 781 (Grant v. Kinney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.