Grant v. Kellogg Co.
This text of 154 F.2d 59 (Grant v. Kellogg Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence amply supports Judge Bright’s findings that (1) the original oral agreement was to endure for a year, (2) there was no reservation of title, either express or implied in fact, and (3) plain *60 tiff’s letter of December 16, 1938, constituted a valid release. We see no errors in the admission or exclusion of evidence. Because of the findings, we do not reach the issue of the extent of the copying. Plaintiff’s elfish imagination seems to have given him a mistaken notion of his rights.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
154 F.2d 59, 75 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 301, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 3109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grant-v-kellogg-co-ca2-1946.