Grant v. Kellogg Co.

154 F.2d 59, 75 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 301, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 3109
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMarch 4, 1946
Docket207
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 154 F.2d 59 (Grant v. Kellogg Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grant v. Kellogg Co., 154 F.2d 59, 75 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 301, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 3109 (2d Cir. 1946).

Opinion

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

The evidence amply supports Judge Bright’s findings that (1) the original oral agreement was to endure for a year, (2) there was no reservation of title, either express or implied in fact, and (3) plain *60 tiff’s letter of December 16, 1938, constituted a valid release. We see no errors in the admission or exclusion of evidence. Because of the findings, we do not reach the issue of the extent of the copying. Plaintiff’s elfish imagination seems to have given him a mistaken notion of his rights.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goodis v. United Artists Television, Inc.
278 F. Supp. 122 (S.D. New York, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
154 F.2d 59, 75 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 301, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 3109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grant-v-kellogg-co-ca2-1946.