Grant v. Kaymore

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Grant v. Kaymore

127 So. 3d 1287, 2013 WL 6636133, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 19918

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 17, 2013

DocketNo. 1D12-5170

StatusPublished

This text of 127 So. 3d 1287 (Grant v. Kaymore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grant v. Kaymore, 127 So. 3d 1287, 2013 WL 6636133, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 19918 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this family law case, we hold that trial court applied the wrong law in denying, as procedurally barred, Appellant’s motion for attorney’s fees. See In re Amendments to Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure, 101 So.3d 360, 360-61 (Fla. 2012) (“Finally, the Committee has pointed out that proposals for settlement are not used and are not appropriate in family law matters; accordingly, new rule 12.442 (Proposals for Settlement) is adopted, specifically stating that [rule 1.442] does not apply in family law cases.”); Fla. Fam. L.R.P. 12.442 (“Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442 shall not apply in proceedings governed by these rules.”). The case is remanded to the trial court to address the motion on the merits.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

THOMAS, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this family law case, we hold that trial court applied the wrong law in denying, as procedurally barred, Appellant’s motion for attorney’s fees. See In re Amendments to Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure, 101 So.3d 360, 360-61 (Fla. 2012) (“Finally, the Committee has pointed out that proposals for settlement are not used and are not appropriate in family law matters; accordingly, new rule 12.442 (Proposals for Settlement) is adopted, specifically stating that [rule 1.442] does not apply in family law cases.”); Fla. Fam. L.R.P. 12.442 (“Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442 shall not apply in proceedings governed by these rules.”). The case is remanded to the trial court to address the motion on the merits.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

THOMAS, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 So. 3d 1287, 2013 WL 6636133, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 19918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grant-v-kaymore-fladistctapp-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack