Grant v. Kaymore

127 So. 3d 1287, 2013 WL 6636133, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 19918
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 17, 2013·No. No. 1D12-5170·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this family law case, we hold that trial court applied the wrong law in denying, as procedurally barred, Appellant’s motion for attorney’s fees. See In re Amendments to Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure, 101 So.3d 360, 360-61 (Fla. 2012) (“Finally, the Committee has pointed out that proposals for settlement are not used and are not appropriate in family law matters; accordingly, new rule 12.442 (Proposals for Settlement) is adopted, specifically stating that [rule 1.442] does not apply in family law cases.”); Fla. Fam. L.R.P. 12.442 (“Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442 shall not apply in proceedings governed by these rules.”). The case is remanded to the trial court to address the motion on the merits.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

THOMAS, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grant v. Kaymore, 127 So. 3d 1287, 2013 WL 6636133, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 19918 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

127 So. 3d 1287 (Grant v. Kaymore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure
101 So. 3d 360 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2012)