Grant v. Jackson

1 Kirby 90
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided August 15, 1786·Published

Opinion

By the whole Court.

The declaration is insufficient; it gives no rule of damages. The orders which the defendant is challenged to account for being no otherwise described than as drawn on the one shilling tax “and as it doth not appear by whom or by what authority they were drawn, or on which of the one shilling taxes, as divers have been granted and were of different values, there is no rule given to the court by which to ascertain their value, or assess damages for not redelivering or otherwise accounting for them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grant v. Jackson, 1 Kirby 90 (Colo. Ct. App. 1786).

1 Kirby 90 (Grant v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.