Grant v. Jackson

Connecticut Superior Court

Grant v. Jackson

1 Kirby 90

DecidedAugust 15, 1786

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Kirby 90 (Grant v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grant v. Jackson, 1 Kirby 90 (Colo. Ct. App. 1786).

Pincite

Opinion

By the whole Court.

The declaration is insufficient; it gives no rule of damages. The orders which the defendant is challenged to account for being no otherwise described than as drawn on the one shilling tax “and as it doth not appear by whom or by what authority they were drawn, or on which of the one shilling taxes, as divers have been granted and were of different values, there is no rule given to the court by which to ascertain their value, or assess damages for not redelivering or otherwise accounting for them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the whole Court.

The declaration is insufficient; it gives no rule of damages. The orders which the defendant is challenged to account for being no otherwise described than as drawn on the one shilling tax “and as it doth not appear by whom or by what authority they were drawn, or on which of the one shilling taxes, as divers have been granted and were of different values, there is no rule given to the court by which to ascertain their value, or assess damages for not redelivering or otherwise accounting for them.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Kirby 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grant-v-jackson-connsuperct-1786.