Grant v. Harrell
109 N.C. 78
Opinion
In view of a multitude of decisions of this Court, it is too clear to admit of serious question that the Court properly dismissed the action upon the ground that the plaintiffs’ remedy is by a motion in the cause. Carter v. Rountree, decided at this term.
DEFENDANTS APPEAL.
The defendant’s appeal is disposed of by what we have said in plaintiffs’ appeal.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grant v. Harrell, 109 N.C. 78 (N.C. 1891).
109 N.C. 78 (Grant v. Harrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clark v. . Homes
128 S.E. 20 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1925)
Clark v. Carolina Homes, Inc.
189 N.C. 703 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1925)
Starnes v. . Thompson
92 S.E. 259 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1917)
Massie v. . Hainey
81 S.E. 135 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1914)
Harris v. . Bennett
76 S.E. 217 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1912)
Rackley v. . Roberts
60 S.E. 975 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1908)