Grant v. Grant

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Grant v. Grant

651 So. 2d 123, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 953, 1995 WL 46450

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Grant v. Grant. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8372 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 8, 1995·No. No. 93-2525·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the final judgment and remand for redistribution of the parties’ assets. We agree with the wife’s argument that the court’s valuation of the wife’s cash assets merits reversal. The evidence does not support the trial court’s determination as to the amount of the wife’s cash savings. The trial court ruled that the wife had savings of approximately $17,000. Although the record does not present a clear picture of her cash savings, it fails to support the finding that she had $17,000 in savings. Instead, the wife apparently had certificates of deposit for $5000, $900 and $500; and a savings account containing $3000.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the final judgment and remand for redistribution of the parties’ assets. We agree with the wife’s argument that the court’s valuation of the wife’s cash assets merits reversal. The evidence does not support the trial court’s determination as to the amount of the wife’s cash savings. The trial court ruled that the wife had savings of approximately $17,000. Although the record does not present a clear picture of her cash savings, it fails to support the finding that she had $17,000 in savings. Instead, the wife apparently had certificates of deposit for $5000, $900 and $500; and a savings account containing $3000.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Grant v. Grant, 651 So. 2d 123, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 953, 1995 WL 46450 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

651 So. 2d 123 (Grant v. Grant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.