Grant v. Glynn Canning Co.

281 U.S. 690, 50 S. Ct. 240, 74 L. Ed. 1120, 1930 U.S. LEXIS 421
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 3, 1930·No. No. 663·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237 (a) of the Judicial Code as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari, as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936,. 938), certiorari [691]*691is denied. The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is therefore also denied.

Mr. Virgil E. Adam for appellant. No appearance for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grant v. Glynn Canning Co., 281 U.S. 690, 50 S. Ct. 240, 74 L. Ed. 1120, 1930 U.S. LEXIS 421 (1930).

281 U.S. 690 (Grant v. Glynn Canning Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sea Tow/Sea Spill v. Phillips
561 S.E.2d 827 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2002)
State Ex Rel. Roddey v. BYRNES, GOVERNOR
66 S.E.2d 33 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1951)
McCollum v. Snipes
49 S.E.2d 12 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1948)
Kelleher v. Minshull
119 P.2d 302 (Washington Supreme Court, 1941)
Ravitz v. Steurele, Justice of the Peace
77 S.W.2d 360 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1934)