Grant v. Fort Peck Tribes

11 Am. Tribal Law 264
CourtFort Peck Appellate Court
DecidedAugust 24, 2010
DocketNo. 538
StatusPublished

This text of 11 Am. Tribal Law 264 (Grant v. Fort Peck Tribes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Fort Peck Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grant v. Fort Peck Tribes, 11 Am. Tribal Law 264 (ftpeckctapp 2010).

Opinion

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This matter comes before the Fort Peck Court of Appeals on a timely filed Notice of Appeal of a jury verdict of Guilty on the charge of Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child, a felony.

Appellant Victor Grant, appeared pro se in the appeal notice, although he did have counsel at trial.

The Fort Peck Court of Appeals set a briefing schedule, which was duly served by mail on the parties. No briefs were filed and no one appeared on the matter.

We find that the Notice of Appeal does not state sufficient grounds for appeal since there was no brief or memorandum filed supporting the allegations stated.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal be, and the same is hereby, denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Am. Tribal Law 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grant-v-fort-peck-tribes-ftpeckctapp-2010.