Grant v. Director of the Central Intelligence Agency

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided July 8, 2020·No. Civil Action No. 2020-1838·Published

Opinion

FILED

7/8/2020

Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Court for the District of Columbia UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 20-1838 (UNA)

)

DIRECTOR OF THE CENTRAL ) INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on consideration of plaintiff’s application to proceed in

forma pauperis and his pro se complaint. Although plaintiff names a different defendant, the

instant complaint is practically identical to the complaint plaintiff filed in another recent case.

See Grant v. Secretary of Defense, No. 20-CV-1803 (D.D.C. June 29, 2020). The Court

dismissed that complaint as frivolous, and will dismiss the instant complaint for the same reason.

Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted.

An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

DATE: July 8, 2020 /s/ JAMES E. BOASBERG United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grant v. Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, (D.D.C. 2020).

Grant v. Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (Grant v. Director of the Central Intelligence Agency) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.