Grant v. Director of the Central Intelligence Agency
Opinion
FILED
7/8/2020
Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Court for the District of Columbia UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Civil Action No. 20-1838 (UNA)
)
DIRECTOR OF THE CENTRAL ) INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, et al., )
)
Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on consideration of plaintiff’s application to proceed in
forma pauperis and his pro se complaint. Although plaintiff names a different defendant, the
instant complaint is practically identical to the complaint plaintiff filed in another recent case.
See Grant v. Secretary of Defense, No. 20-CV-1803 (D.D.C. June 29, 2020). The Court
dismissed that complaint as frivolous, and will dismiss the instant complaint for the same reason.
Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted.
An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.
DATE: July 8, 2020 /s/ JAMES E. BOASBERG United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grant v. Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (Grant v. Director of the Central Intelligence Agency) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.