Grant v. City of New York

Opinion

/ DOCUMENI ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#: scam: IB UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | DATE FILED: LG} □□□□ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK , eS tt 88 kt tt tn mn A JAMES GRANT, : Plaintiff, : : 1:19-cev-04334 (ALC) -against- : : ORDER THE CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL., : Defendants. : □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., District Judge: The Court is in receipt of the Parties’ Joint Status Report dated November 26, 2019. ECF No. 30. The Parties’ proposed briefing schedule, which is also included below, is hereby GRANTED.

Motion to dismiss: January 24, 2020 Opposition to Motion: February 24, 2020 Reply to Opposition: March 3, 2020 In addition, pursuant to Rule 26(c), discovery in this case is stayed during the pendency of the motion to dismiss. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c); see also Integrated Sys. & Power, Inc. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc., No. 09 CV 5874 (RPP), 2009 WL 2777076, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 1, 2009) (“It is equally well-settled that upon a showing of good cause a district court has considerable discretion to stay discovery pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”) SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York December 12, 2019 / (rade (ae oD —~ ANDREW L. CARTER, JR. United States District Judge