Grant v. Butt
17 S.E.2d 689, 198 S.C. 298, 1941 S.C. LEXIS 86
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This Court is in full accord with the result of the judgment of the Circuit Court reached on several grounds in the order of Special Judge George Bell Timmerman sustaining the demurrer to the complaint. This order sufficiently states *313 the pleadings and issues; it will be reported. Appellant’s exceptions thereto have been carefully considered and are overruled and the judgment below affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grant v. Butt, 17 S.E.2d 689, 198 S.C. 298, 1941 S.C. LEXIS 86 (S.C. 1941).
17 S.E.2d 689 (Grant v. Butt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
W & N Construction Co. v. Williams
472 S.E.2d 622 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1996)
Anderson v. Charleston Capital Corp. (In Re D.A. Kennerly)
90 B.R. 781 (D. South Carolina, 1987)
Ricks v. Ficken
312 S.E.2d 715 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1984)
Graham v. Graham
278 S.E.2d 346 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1981)
Hewitt v. Hewitt
394 N.E.2d 1204 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1979)
Associated Spring Corp. v. Roy F. Wilson & Avnet, Inc.
410 F. Supp. 967 (D. South Carolina, 1976)
Tyranski v. Piggins
205 N.W.2d 595 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1973)
Standard Register Co. v. Kerrigan
119 S.E.2d 533 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1961)
Brabham v. Miller Electric Co.
118 S.E.2d 167 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1961)
Batchelor v. American Health Insurance
107 S.E.2d 36 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1959)
Pendarvis v. Berry
52 S.E.2d 705 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1949)
Ex Parte Rosenfeld
51 S.E.2d 88 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1948)