Grant v. . Burgwyn
This text of 79 N.C. 513 (Grant v. . Burgwyn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendants entered a special appearance and moved: (1) To dismiss the action because there *514 was no service of the summons returnable to Fall Term, 1877, and no alias issued. (2) To dissolve the attachment for want of sufficient affidavits. The attachment issued before said Fall Term. In regard to the first motion His Honor after setting out the evidence finds as a fact, that service was had by publication, and on examination of the whole record we think his finding was correct and his refusal of the motion is sustained. In regard to the second motion we are of the same opinion. The affidavit of June the 18th is in the very words of the statute and that must be sufficient. In looking at the whole record it appears "that the statute on this subject has been substantially complied with.
No error. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
79 N.C. 513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grant-v-burgwyn-nc-1878.