Grant v. Bruton
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-50434 Conference Calendar
KEVIN DEWAYNE GRANT,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
RANDALL BRUTON,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-95-CV-147 - - - - - - - - - -
October 23, 1996 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Kevin Dewayne Grant, #441812, an inmate of the Texas
Department of Criminal Justice, moves for leave to appeal in
forma pauperis (IFP) from the district court’s grant of the
defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law. Because his
appeal fails to present a nonfrivolous issue, the motion for IFP
is DENIED. Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). Grant’s motion for a copy of
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-50434 - 2 -
his trial transcript at Government expense is also DENIED. The
appeal is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution appellant
that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will invite
the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, appellant is
further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that
they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grant v. Bruton (Grant v. Bruton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.