Grant v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Grant v. Boston & Maine Railroad

95 A. 699, 113 Me. 571, 1915 Me. LEXIS 204

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided August 30, 1915·Published

Opinion

At the Portland term, 1915, of the Law Court, the following entry was made on the docket in each of the above named cases; “Transcript of evidence to be filed within 30 days, or motion for a new trial overruled for want of prosecution.”

It having been made to appear that no transcript was filed within said thirty days, the entry will be, in each case, motion overruled for want of prosecution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

At the Portland term, 1915, of the Law Court, the following entry was made on the docket in each of the above named cases; “Transcript of evidence to be filed within 30 days, or motion for a new trial overruled for want of prosecution.”

It having been made to appear that no transcript was filed within said thirty days, the entry will be, in each case, motion overruled for want of prosecution.

Grant v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 95 A. 699, 113 Me. 571, 1915 Me. LEXIS 204 (Me. 1915).

Pincite

95 A. 699 (Grant v. Boston & Maine Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.