Grant, R.A. v. Grant, L.
This text of Grant, R.A. v. Grant, L. (Grant, R.A. v. Grant, L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
RUTH ANN GRANT, AS EXECUTRIX OF : No. 105 WAL 2024 THE ESTATE OF RUTH M. GRANT, : SUCCESSOR IN THE INTEREST TO : RUTH M. GRANT, : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court Petitioner : : : v. : : : LOUIS A. GRANT, JR., : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 9th day of July, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner are:
a. Did the Superior Court err in holding that the quitclaim deed that is the subject of the instant action was insufficient manifestation of [decedent’s] intent to sever the joint tenancy with [respondent] from which she could not retreat because that finding conflicts with other intermediate appellate court opinions and determinations of this Court?
b. Did the Superior Court err in concluding that there was no severance of the joint tenancy because [decedent] did not convey the [subject property] to a third party because that holding conflicts with prior determinations of this Court?
Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of the matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Grant, R.A. v. Grant, L., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grant-ra-v-grant-l-pa-2024.