Grant Entertainment, Inc. v. Lee

186 A.D.2d 66, 588 N.Y.S.2d 770, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10762
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 22, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 186 A.D.2d 66 (Grant Entertainment, Inc. v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grant Entertainment, Inc. v. Lee, 186 A.D.2d 66, 588 N.Y.S.2d 770, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10762 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly S. Cohen, J.), entered February 6, 1992, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and the judgment entered thereon on March 3, 1992, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The contract sued upon is clear and unambiguous. Plaintiffs failure to perform constituted a material breach of contract and failure of consideration that gave defendant the right to rescind (Fugelsang v Fugelsang, 131 AD2d 810, 812). There being no ambiguity in the terms and conditions of the contract, the IAS Court properly precluded any consideration of parol evidence (see, Buckthorn, Ltd. v Rollins Burdick Hunter, 109 AD2d 8, 10-11).

We have considered appellant’s other claims and find them to be without merit. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Milonas, Wallach and Kupferman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ASKL Enterprises, Inc. v. NYNEX Long Distance Co.
7 A.D.3d 424 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 A.D.2d 66, 588 N.Y.S.2d 770, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grant-entertainment-inc-v-lee-nyappdiv-1992.