Grant Bauserman v. Unemployment Insurance Agency

Michigan Supreme Court

Grant Bauserman v. Unemployment Insurance Agency

909 N.W.2d 268, 501 Mich. 1047

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedApril 6, 2018

DocketSC: 156389; COA: 333181

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 909 N.W.2d 268 (Grant Bauserman v. Unemployment Insurance Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grant Bauserman v. Unemployment Insurance Agency, 909 N.W.2d 268, 501 Mich. 1047 (Mich. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 18, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

The appellants shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether "the happening of the event giving rise to [appellants'] cause of action" for the deprivation of property without due process occurred when the appellee issued its allegedly wrongful notice of redetermination, or when the appellee actually seized the appellants' property. MCL 600.6431(3) ; MCL 600.5827 ; cf. Frank v. Linkner , 500 Mich. 133 , 149-153, 894 N.W.2d 574 (2017). In addition to the brief, the appellants shall electronically file an appendix conforming to MCR 7.312(D)(2). In the brief, citations to the record must provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellee shall file a supplemental brief within 21 days of being served with the appellants' brief. The appellee shall also electronically file an appendix, or in the alternative, stipulate to the use of the appendix filed by the appellants. A reply, if any, must be filed by the appellants within 14 days of being served with the appellee's brief. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

The Michigan League for Public Policy is invited to file a brief amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issue presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 18, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

The appellants shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether "the happening of the event giving rise to [appellants'] cause of action" for the deprivation of property without due process occurred when the appellee issued its allegedly wrongful notice of redetermination, or when the appellee actually seized the appellants' property. MCL 600.6431(3) ; MCL 600.5827 ; cf. Frank v. Linkner , 500 Mich. 133 , 149-153, 894 N.W.2d 574 (2017). In addition to the brief, the appellants shall electronically file an appendix conforming to MCR 7.312(D)(2). In the brief, citations to the record must provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellee shall file a supplemental brief within 21 days of being served with the appellants' brief. The appellee shall also electronically file an appendix, or in the alternative, stipulate to the use of the appendix filed by the appellants. A reply, if any, must be filed by the appellants within 14 days of being served with the appellee's brief. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

The Michigan League for Public Policy is invited to file a brief amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issue presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

909 N.W.2d 268, 501 Mich. 1047, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grant-bauserman-v-unemployment-insurance-agency-mich-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack