Granite Bituminous Paving Co. v. Parkview Realty & Improvement Co.
Opinions
As the judgment of the court in this case involves the identical question and determines it in the same way as that involved in the case of Granite Bituminous Paving Company v. Parkview Realty & Improvement Company et al., (No. 12,563), between the same parties and decided today (168 Mo. App. 468, 151 S. W. 479), I respectfully dissent therefrom for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion filed in the case last mentioned. I deem the judgment of the court in this case to be in conflict with the judgment of the Kansas City Court of Appeals in the case of Forrey v. Holmes, 65 Mo. App'. 114 and also with the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Morey Engineering & Construction Co. v. St. Louis Artificial Ice Rink Co., 242 Mo. 241, 146 S. W. 1142. and therefore request that the cause be certified to the .Supreme Court for final determination, as provided in the Constitution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
151 S.W. 487 (Granite Bituminous Paving Co. v. Parkview Realty & Improvement Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.