Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Granit v. Abramowitz

Granit v. Abramowitz

112 N.Y.S. 1081
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 24, 1908
StatusPublished

This text of 112 N.Y.S. 1081 (Granit v. Abramowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Granit v. Abramowitz, 112 N.Y.S. 1081 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinions

SEABURY, J.

It seems to me that the motion to vacate the judgment was properly denied. While the title of the action does not refer to the defendants as copartners, the complaint contains the allegation usual in an action against a copartnership. The decision- rendered in the action finds as a fact that the defendants were copartners. The articles of copartnership, which are before the court, established beyond all question that the defendants were copartners.

The order appealed from should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

GILDERSLEEVE, P. J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yerkes v. . McFadden
36 N.E. 7 (New York Court of Appeals, 1894)
First National Bank v. . Shuler
47 N.E. 262 (New York Court of Appeals, 1897)
Bennett v. . Whitney
94 N.Y. 302 (New York Court of Appeals, 1884)
Teller v. Gerry
30 Misc. 126 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 N.Y.S. 1081, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/granit-v-abramowitz-nyappterm-1908.