Granillo, Ex Parte Noe

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 2, 2007
DocketAP-75,672
StatusPublished

This text of Granillo, Ex Parte Noe (Granillo, Ex Parte Noe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Granillo, Ex Parte Noe, (Tex. 2007).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NOS. AP-75,672 & AP-75,673
EX PARTE NOE GRANILLO, Applicant


ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. F87-78541-KN AND F87-78542-KN

IN THE 195TH DISTRICT COURT
OF DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of the offenses of aggravated assault and received concurrent sentences of imprisonment for sixteen (16) years.

Applicant contends that his parole release was revoked in violation of due process because expunged arrest records were used as evidence against him and he was coerced into waiving the preliminary and final revocation hearings by his parole officer's promise that Applicant would be released if he signed the waivers. Applicant further contends that as a result of the invalid revocation, he is now being held in custody beyond his maximum discharge date. We remanded these applications to Dallas County to allow the trial judge to enter findings of fact and conclusions of law and complete the records.

The trial court received information from the Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Office of General Counsel and determined that Applicant's parole release revocation was based on expunged arrest records and that release would not have been revoked if TDCJ had been on notice of the expunction at the time of revocation. Accordingly, we grant relief. Applicant shall be released and Applicant shall receive credit against his sentence for the period of supervised release that he was serving prior to revocation.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division, the Board of Pardons and Paroles, and the Parole Division.



Delivered: May 2, 2007

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Granillo, Ex Parte Noe, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/granillo-ex-parte-noe-texcrimapp-2007.