Granger v. State

2014 Ark. App. 414
Court of Appeals of Arkansas·Decided June 18, 2014·No. CR-13-791·Published

Opinion

Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 414

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION IV No. CR-13-791

Opinion Delivered June 18, 2014

ANTHONY C. GRANGER APPEAL FROM THE CRITTENDEN APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. CR-2007-739] V. HONORABLE RALPH WILSON, JR., STATE OF ARKANSAS JUDGE APPELLEE AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED

RHONDA K. WOOD, Judge

This is a no-merit brief from the revocation of Anthony Granger’s suspended

sentence. No pro se points have been filed. We affirm the revocation and grant counsel’s

motion to withdraw.

In 2007, Granger pleaded guilty to first-degree criminal mischief and theft of

property. The circuit court sentenced him to 36 months’ imprisonment and 120 months’

suspended imposition of sentence. The State filed a petition to revoke the suspended

sentence in April 2013. The petition alleged that Granger had violated the conditions of

his suspended sentence by failing to pay fines and restitution and committing various new

crimes.

A hearing took place wherein the circuit court found that Granger had violated his

conditions by failing to pay fines and restitution and committing the new crimes of

resisting arrest and possession of drug paraphernalia. It accordingly sentenced Granger to Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 414

72 months in prison. The no-merit brief asserts that there is no meritorious basis to appeal

this decision. The brief also addresses the single adverse ruling (other than the revocation)

and makes the same argument.

Under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-3(k)(1)

(2013), appellate counsel may file a motion to withdraw on grounds that the appeal is

without merit. This motion should accompanied by an abstract and brief explaining why

any adverse rulings do not provide a meritorious ground for reversal. After examining the

no-merit brief and abstract, we agree that an appeal would be meritless. We further hold

that counsel has complied with our rules. We therefore grant the motion to withdraw and

affirm the revocation.

Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.

HARRISON and GRUBER, JJ., agree.

C. Brian Williams, for appellant.

No response.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Granger v. State, 2014 Ark. App. 414 (Ark. Ct. App. 2014).

2014 Ark. App. 414 (Granger v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)