Granger v. Director Scotty Bodiford

512 F. App'x 358
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 28, 2013
DocketNo. 12-7621
StatusPublished

This text of 512 F. App'x 358 (Granger v. Director Scotty Bodiford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Granger v. Director Scotty Bodiford, 512 F. App'x 358 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Floyd Granger appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Granger v. Dir. Bodiford, No. 6:1 1-cv-01162-RB H, 2012 WL 4009458 (D.S.C. Sept. 12, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
512 F. App'x 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/granger-v-director-scotty-bodiford-ca4-2013.