Grange v. Gough

California Supreme Court

Grange v. Gough

4 P. 1177, 2 Cal. Unrep. 410

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 2, 1884

DocketNo. 8446

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 P. 1177 (Grange v. Gough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grange v. Gough, 4 P. 1177, 2 Cal. Unrep. 410 (Cal. 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

By the COURT.

The court found that the demanded premises were never at any time the separate property of the defendant Margaret Gough, and that the defendants did not nor did either of them reside on said premises at the time of filing .their declaration of homestead. A homestead consists of the dwelling-house in which the claimant resides, and the land on which the same is situated, selected as provided in title 5 of the Civil Code: Civ. Code, sec. 1237.

We think the evidence, though conflicting, was sufficient to justify these findings. Judgment and order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the COURT.

The court found that the demanded premises were never at any time the separate property of the defendant Margaret Gough, and that the defendants did not nor did either of them reside on said premises at the time of filing .their declaration of homestead. A homestead consists of the dwelling-house in which the claimant resides, and the land on which the same is situated, selected as provided in title 5 of the Civil Code: Civ. Code, sec. 1237.

We think the evidence, though conflicting, was sufficient to justify these findings. Judgment and order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 P. 1177, 2 Cal. Unrep. 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grange-v-gough-cal-1884.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack