Graney v. Caduceus Properties, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Graney v. Caduceus Properties, LLC

150 So. 3d 259, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 15591, 2014 WL 4987916

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 7, 2014

DocketNo. 1D11-2700

StatusPublished

This text of 150 So. 3d 259 (Graney v. Caduceus Properties, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Graney v. Caduceus Properties, LLC, 150 So. 3d 259, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 15591, 2014 WL 4987916 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

In Graney v. Caduceus, 91 So.3d 220, 222-23 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012), we reversed the trial court’s order entering judgment in favor of Appellees, holding that the action brought by Appellees was barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Finding the statute of limitations issue to be dispositive, we declined to reach the remaining seven issues raised by Appellants. However, we also certified conflict with Gatins v. Sebastian Inlet Tax Dist., 453 So.2d 871, 875 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

[260]*260Upon review, in Caduceus Properties, LLC v. Graney, 137 So.3d 987 (Fla.2014), the Florida Supreme Court approved the decision in Gatins on the issue of the statute of limitations, quashed our decision, and remanded for further proceedings in light of its decision.

We have considered the remaining issues raised by Appellants on appeal. Finding no merit in the remaining issues, the final judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK, THOMAS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI