Grandstaff v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

487 So. 2d 420, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1038, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7609
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 30, 1986·No. No. 85-1133·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order permanently committing a nine-year-old child to the custody of HRS for adoption.

The record amply supports the trial court’s findings that the child’s parents have abandoned her, that the child’s grandparents with whom the child lived failed to fulfill material provisions of their performance agreement entered into with HRS, and that the best interests of the child require that she be permanently removed from her family environment.

Affirmed.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and LEHAN and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grandstaff v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 487 So. 2d 420, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1038, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7609 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

487 So. 2d 420 (Grandstaff v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crigler v. State
487 So. 2d 420 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)