Grandison v. United States Parole Commission

171 F. App'x 998
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 23, 2006·No. No. 05-6999·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Grandison, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Grandison v. United States Parole Comm’n, No. CA-04-3814-AW (D. Md. May 11, 18, & 25, 2005). We deny the motion for a certificate of appealability and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grandison v. United States Parole Commission, 171 F. App'x 998 (4th Cir. 2006).

171 F. App'x 998 (Grandison v. United States Parole Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241