Grandison v. United States Parole Commission
This text of 171 F. App'x 998 (Grandison v. United States Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Anthony Grandison, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Grandison v. United States Parole Comm’n, No. CA-04-3814-AW (D. Md. May 11, 18, & 25, 2005). We deny the motion for a certificate of appealability and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
171 F. App'x 998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grandison-v-united-states-parole-commission-ca4-2006.