Grandison v. State
This text of 691 So. 2d 591 (Grandison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant challenges his judgment and sentence for one count of possession of cocaine. Appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm the judgment and sentence, but reverse and remand for correction of a scrivener’s error contained in the written judgment. The [592]*592written judgment indicates that appellant was convicted of possession of cocaine with intent to sell, a second-degree felony in violation of section 893.18(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1995). However, appellant was convicted of simple possession of cocaine, a third-degree felony, in violation of section 893.13(6)(a), Florida Statutes (1995). The trial court is directed to correct the written judgment accordingly.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
691 So. 2d 591, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3909, 1997 WL 178906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grandison-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.