Grandison v. State

691 So. 2d 591, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3909, 1997 WL 178906
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 16, 1997·No. No. 95-2693·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MICKLE, Judge.

Appellant challenges his judgment and sentence for one count of possession of cocaine. Appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm the judgment and sentence, but reverse and remand for correction of a scrivener’s error contained in the written judgment. The [592]*592written judgment indicates that appellant was convicted of possession of cocaine with intent to sell, a second-degree felony in violation of section 893.18(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1995). However, appellant was convicted of simple possession of cocaine, a third-degree felony, in violation of section 893.13(6)(a), Florida Statutes (1995). The trial court is directed to correct the written judgment accordingly.

AFFIRMED.

WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grandison v. State, 691 So. 2d 591, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3909, 1997 WL 178906 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

691 So. 2d 591 (Grandison v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allen v. State
98 So. 3d 1274 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Pryor v. State
973 So. 2d 1245 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)