Grandison v. Parker Mobile Home Service, Inc.
27 So. 3d 811, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2106, 2010 WL 624205
Opinion
Affirmed. See Rubido v. Brinks, Inc., 601 So.2d 1298, 1300 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (affirming denial of benefits due to misconduct where, even though coworker told employee that employee had permission to act contrary to company policy, employee should not have acted in reliance on coworker’s statement without management’s written permission).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grandison v. Parker Mobile Home Service, Inc., 27 So. 3d 811, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2106, 2010 WL 624205 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).
27 So. 3d 811 (Grandison v. Parker Mobile Home Service, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rubido v. Brinks, Inc.
601 So. 2d 1298 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)