Grande v. Hillsborough County
This text of 623 So. 2d 1254 (Grande v. Hillsborough County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order dismissing two counts of the appellants’ complaint founded in strict liability and inverse condemnation. We affirm as to the count sounding in strict liability. § 768.28(1), Fla.Stat. (1991); Schick v. Florida Dep’t of Agriculture, 504 So.2d 1318 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 513 So.2d 1060 (Fla.1987). The trial court dismissed the inverse condemnation count concluding such relief is inapplicable to personal property. We disagree. Flatt v. City of Brooksville, 368 So.2d 631 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979), cited with approval in In re Forfeiture of 1976 Kenworth Truck, 576 So.2d 261 (Fla.1990).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions to reinstate Count VI and for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
623 So. 2d 1254, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9869, 1993 WL 383532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grande-v-hillsborough-county-fladistctapp-1993.