Grandberry v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Grandberry v. State

509 S.W.3d 153, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 53, 2017 WL 401831

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 31, 2017·No. WD 79356·Published

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam:

Mr. Gary Grandberry appeals the Circuit Court of Jackson County’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion, which was based on claims that his plea counsel provided ineffective legal assistance and coerced him into accepting a plea offer from the State. There being no prece-dential value in our ruling, we have instead provided the parties a legal memorandum explaining our ruling. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam:

Mr. Gary Grandberry appeals the Circuit Court of Jackson County’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion, which was based on claims that his plea counsel provided ineffective legal assistance and coerced him into accepting a plea offer from the State. There being no prece-dential value in our ruling, we have instead provided the parties a legal memorandum explaining our ruling. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Grandberry v. State, 509 S.W.3d 153, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 53, 2017 WL 401831 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

509 S.W.3d 153 (Grandberry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.