Grandberry v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Grandberry v. State

509 S.W.3d 153, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 53, 2017 WL 401831

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 31, 2017

DocketWD 79356

StatusPublished

This text of 509 S.W.3d 153 (Grandberry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grandberry v. State, 509 S.W.3d 153, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 53, 2017 WL 401831 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam:

Mr. Gary Grandberry appeals the Circuit Court of Jackson County’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion, which was based on claims that his plea counsel provided ineffective legal assistance and coerced him into accepting a plea offer from the State. There being no prece-dential value in our ruling, we have instead provided the parties a legal memorandum explaining our ruling. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam:

Mr. Gary Grandberry appeals the Circuit Court of Jackson County’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion, which was based on claims that his plea counsel provided ineffective legal assistance and coerced him into accepting a plea offer from the State. There being no prece-dential value in our ruling, we have instead provided the parties a legal memorandum explaining our ruling. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

509 S.W.3d 153, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 53, 2017 WL 401831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grandberry-v-state-moctapp-2017.