Grandberry v. Department of Homeland Security

395 F. App'x 684

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Grandberry v. Department of Homeland Security. Read the opinion of the Court — 406 F. App'x 472 →

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided September 15, 2010·No. 2010-3091·Unpublished

Opinion

ON MOTION

ORDER

Counsel for the petitioner submits two motions for leave to withdraw. Separately, Sylvester Grandberry moves for leave to participate in oral argument pro se.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motions for leave to withdraw are granted.

(2) Grandberry’s motion for oral argument is deferred for consideration by the merits panel assigned to decide this case.

(3) A copy of Grandberry’s motion and this order shall be transmitted to the merits panel assigned to decide this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION

ORDER

Counsel for the petitioner submits two motions for leave to withdraw. Separately, Sylvester Grandberry moves for leave to participate in oral argument pro se.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motions for leave to withdraw are granted.

(2) Grandberry’s motion for oral argument is deferred for consideration by the merits panel assigned to decide this case.

(3) A copy of Grandberry’s motion and this order shall be transmitted to the merits panel assigned to decide this case.

Grandberry v. Department of Homeland Security, 395 F. App'x 684 (Fed. Cir. 2010).

Pincite

395 F. App'x 684 (Grandberry v. Department of Homeland Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.