Granda v. Siegendorf

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Granda v. Siegendorf

370 So. 2d 1227, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15027

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 15, 1979·No. No. 79-348·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is granted, the motion to dismiss is denied, and the respondent judicial referee is directed to hold a full medical mediation hearing with all three panel members present based on the authority of Grossman v. Duncan, 371 So.2d 142 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Hewitt v. Caffee, 368 So.2d 1342 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Diggett v. Conkling, 368 So.2d 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). We are confident that it will be unnecessary for this court to issue a peremptory writ of mandamus and that the respondent judicial referee upon receipt of this opinion will comply with this court’s directive as stated above. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is granted, the motion to dismiss is denied, and the respondent judicial referee is directed to hold a full medical mediation hearing with all three panel members present based on the authority of Grossman v. Duncan, 371 So.2d 142 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Hewitt v. Caffee, 368 So.2d 1342 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Diggett v. Conkling, 368 So.2d 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). We are confident that it will be unnecessary for this court to issue a peremptory writ of mandamus and that the respondent judicial referee upon receipt of this opinion will comply with this court’s directive as stated above. It is so ordered.

Granda v. Siegendorf, 370 So. 2d 1227, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15027 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

370 So. 2d 1227 (Granda v. Siegendorf) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related