Granda v. CALPERS

District Court, E.D. California·Decided March 15, 2023·No. 2:21-cv-01256·Unknown

Opinion

ELISE R. SANGUINETTI, SBN: 191389 ARIAS SANGUINETTI WANG & TORRIJOS 2200 Powell Street, Suite 740 Emeryville, CA 94608 Telephone: (510) 629-4877 Facsimile: (510) 291-9742 Email: elise@aswtlawyers.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Sara Granda & Jose Granda

SACRAMENTO DIVISION SARA GRANDA, an individual & JOSE Case No.: 2:21-cv-01256-MCE-KJN GRANDA, an individual; Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.

Plaintiffs, STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE

v. ORDER

RETIREMENT SYSTEM; and DOES 1-10, Inclusive,

Defendants.

/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to the above-captioned Proceeding, by and through their respective counsel of record, that in order to facilitate the exchange of information and documents which may be subject to confidentiality limitations on disclosure due to federal laws, state laws, and privacy rights, the Parties stipulate as follows: In this Stipulation and Protective Order, the words set forth below shall have the following meanings: “Proceeding” means the above-entitled proceeding, Case No. 2:21-cv-01256-MCE- KJN. “Court” means the United States District Court, or any judge to which this Proceeding may be assigned, including Court staff participating in such proceedings. “Confidential” means any information which is in the possession of a Designating Party who believes in good faith that such information is entitled to confidential treatment under applicable law. “Confidential Materials” means any Documents, Testimony or Information as defined below designated as Confidential pursuant to the provisions of this Stipulation and Protective Order. “Designating Party” means the Party that designates Materials as “Confidential.” “Disclose” or “Disclosed” or “Disclosure” means to reveal, divulge, give, or make available Materials, or any part thereof, or any information contained therein. “Documents” means (i) any “Writing,” “Original,” and “Duplicate” as those terms are defined by California Evidence Code Sections 250, 255, and 260, which have been produced in discovery in this Proceeding by any person, and (ii) any copies, reproductions, or summaries of all or any part of the foregoing. “Information” means the content of Documents or Testimony. “Testimony” means all depositions, declarations or other testimony taken or used in this Proceeding. The Designating Party shall have the right to designate as Confidential any Documents, Testimony or Information that the Designating Party in good faith believes to contain non-public information that is entitled to confidential treatment under applicable law. The entry of this Stipulation and Protective Order does not alter, waive, modify, or abridge any right, privilege or protection otherwise available to any Party with respect to the discovery of matters, including but not limited to any Party’s right to assert the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work product doctrine, or other privileges, or any Party’s right to contest any such assertion. Any Documents, Testimony or Information to be designated as Confidential must be clearly so designated before the Document, Testimony or Information is Disclosed or produced. The Parties may agree that the case name and number are to be part of the Confidential designation. The Confidential designation should not obscure or interfere with the legibility of the designated Information. For Documents (apart from transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), the Designating Party must affix the legend “Confidential” on each page of any Document containing such designated Confidential Material. For Testimony given in depositions the Designating Party may either: i. identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, all Confidential Testimony, by specifying all portions of the Testimony that qualify as “Confidential;” or ii. designate the entirety of the Testimony at the deposition as Confidential (before the deposition is concluded) with the right to identify more specific portions of the Testimony as to which protection is sought within 30 days following receipt of the deposition transcript. In circumstances where portions of the deposition Testimony are designated for protection, the transcript pages containing Confidential Information may be separately bound by the court reporter, who must affix to the top of each page the legend “Confidential,” as instructed by the Designating Party. For Information produced in some form other than Documents, and for any other tangible items, including, without limitation, compact discs or DVDs, the Designating Party must affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the container or containers in which the Information or item is stored the legend “Confidential.” If only portions of the Information or item warrant protection, the Designating Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the Confidential portions. For written discovery in which Confidential Information is incorporated in answers to interrogatories, responses to requests for admission, or other written discovery, the Designating Party must affix the legend “Confidential” on the first page of the written discovery and on each page containing answers or responses that contain such designated material. The inadvertent production by any of the undersigned Parties or non-Parties to the Proceedings of any Document, Testimony or Information during discovery in this Proceeding without a Confidential designation, shall be without prejudice to any claim that such item is Confidential and such Party shall not be held to have waived any rights by such inadvertent production. In the event that any Document, Testimony or Information that is subject to a Confidential designation is inadvertently produced without such designation, the Party that inadvertently produced the document shall give written notice of such inadvertent production within twenty (20) days of discovery of the inadvertent production, together with a further copy of the subject Document, Testimony or Information designated as Confidential (the “Inadvertent Production Notice”). Upon receipt of such Inadvertent Production Notice, the Party that received the inadvertently produced Document, Testimony or Information shall promptly destroy the inadvertently produced Document, Testimony or Information and all copies thereof, or, at the expense of the producing Party, return such together with all copies of such Document, Testimony or Information to counsel for the producing Party and shall retain only the Confidential designated Materials. Should the receiving Party choose to destroy such inadvertently produced Document, Testimony or Information, the receiving Party shall notify the producing Party in writing of such destruction within ten (10) days of receipt of written notice of the inadvertent production. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the receiving Party Disclosed such Document, Testimony or Information to persons not authorized to receive such information before receipt of the Confidential designation, such Disclosure shall not be deemed a violation of this Stipulated Protective Order. In the event the receiving Party receives an Inadvertent Production Notice, the receiving Party shall either make reasonable efforts to promptly retrieve the Document, Testimony or Information or shall promptly notify the Designating Party of the distribution and the identity of the person who received the Document, Testimony or Information. This provision is not intended to apply to any inadvertent production of any Information protected by attorney-client or work product privileges. In the event that this provision conflicts with any applicable law regarding waiver of confidentiality through the inadvertent production of Documents, Testimony or Information, such law shall govern. In the event that counsel for a Party receiving Documents, Testimony or Information in disco

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Granda v. CALPERS, (E.D. Cal. 2023).

Granda v. CALPERS (Granda v. CALPERS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.