Grand v. Fitzgerald

155 So. 2d 419
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 30, 1963
DocketNo. 63-105
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 155 So. 2d 419 (Grand v. Fitzgerald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grand v. Fitzgerald, 155 So. 2d 419 (Fla. Ct. App. 1963).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Joan Pecheux Grand, as Executrix of the estate of Laurence M. A. B. Sanchez, claims error because the county judge denied her “Petition to extend time to file objections to claims”. Section 733.18(2), Fla.Stat., F.S.A. grants to the county judge the right to extend the time for filing objection to a claim for “good cause shown”. The discretion is in the county judge.

The appellant argues that the county judge ought to have extended the time, but fails to carry the burden of demonstrating an abuse of discretion. Therefore, no error has been shown.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brodfuehrer v. Estate of Brodfuehrer
833 So. 2d 784 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 So. 2d 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grand-v-fitzgerald-fladistctapp-1963.