Grand Union Co. v. Sutter
230 So. 2d 478
Opinions
Affirmed. The court properly submitted to the jury the question of defendant’s negligence and plaintiff’s contributory negligence. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Miller, Fla.App.1969, 220 So.2d 680.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grand Union Co. v. Sutter, 230 So. 2d 478 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).
230 So. 2d 478 (Grand Union Co. v. Sutter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Grall v. Risden
167 So. 2d 610 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Bowles v. Elkes Pontiac Co.
63 So. 2d 769 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1953)
Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Miller
220 So. 2d 680 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Isenberg v. Ortona Park Recreational Center, Inc.
160 So. 2d 132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
May v. Allied Chlorine & Chemical Products, Inc.
168 So. 2d 784 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Jacobs v. Claughton
97 So. 2d 53 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1957)
Baione v. City of Tampa
199 So. 2d 743 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Stueber v. Maintenance, Inc.
205 So. 2d 305 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)