GRAND TRAVERSE v. Michigan Public Service Commission
752 N.W.2d 454, 481 Mich. 945
Opinion
GRAND TRAVERSE, Montcalm, Delta, Hillsdale, Houghton, Dickinson, Cass, Chippewa, Menominee, Tuscola, Cheboygan, Emmet, Charlevoix, Saginaw, Newaygo, Ionia, Gogebic, Ogemaw, Mackinac, Alpena, Huron, and Alcona Counties, Appellants,
v.
MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION and Telecommunications Association of Michigan, Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the June 26, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
GRAND TRAVERSE v. Michigan Public Service Commission, 752 N.W.2d 454, 481 Mich. 945 (Mich. 2008).
752 N.W.2d 454 (GRAND TRAVERSE v. Michigan Public Service Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Mattson
752 N.W.2d 455 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2008)