Grand Reserve at Tampa Condominium Ass'n v. HSBC Bank USA, National Ass'n

189 So. 3d 187, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1180
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 29, 2016·No. No. 2D14-3590·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order on appeal in all respects save one. • Upon concession of error by Appellee,- we reverse the imposition of: costs the circuit court awarded .under section 57.105, Florida Statutes (2014), as this statute “does not provide a mechanism for recovering , costs.” See Pronman v. Styles, 163 So.3d 535, 538 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (citing Santini v. Cleveland Clinic Fla., 65 So.3d 22, 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)). We remand this case for the court to strike the provision of costs from its order.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

WALLACE, BLACK,'and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grand Reserve at Tampa Condominium Ass'n v. HSBC Bank USA, National Ass'n, 189 So. 3d 187, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1180 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

189 So. 3d 187 (Grand Reserve at Tampa Condominium Ass'n v. HSBC Bank USA, National Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Santini v. Cleveland Clinic Florida
65 So. 3d 22 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)