Grand Reserve at Tampa Condominium Ass'n v. HSBC Bank USA, National Ass'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Grand Reserve at Tampa Condominium Ass'n v. HSBC Bank USA, National Ass'n

189 So. 3d 187, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1180

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 29, 2016

DocketNo. 2D14-3590

StatusPublished

This text of 189 So. 3d 187 (Grand Reserve at Tampa Condominium Ass'n v. HSBC Bank USA, National Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grand Reserve at Tampa Condominium Ass'n v. HSBC Bank USA, National Ass'n, 189 So. 3d 187, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1180 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order on appeal in all respects save one. • Upon concession of error by Appellee,- we reverse the imposition of: costs the circuit court awarded .under section 57.105, Florida Statutes (2014), as this statute “does not provide a mechanism for recovering , costs.” See Pronman v. Styles, 163 So.3d 535, 538 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (citing Santini v. Cleveland Clinic Fla., 65 So.3d 22, 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)). We remand this case for the court to strike the provision of costs from its order.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

WALLACE, BLACK,'and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order on appeal in all respects save one. • Upon concession of error by Appellee,- we reverse the imposition of: costs the circuit court awarded .under section 57.105, Florida Statutes (2014), as this statute “does not provide a mechanism for recovering , costs.” See Pronman v. Styles, 163 So.3d 535, 538 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (citing Santini v. Cleveland Clinic Fla., 65 So.3d 22, 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)). We remand this case for the court to strike the provision of costs from its order.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

WALLACE, BLACK,'and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 So. 3d 187, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grand-reserve-at-tampa-condominium-assn-v-hsbc-bank-usa-national-assn-fladistctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack