Grand Rapids & Indiana R. R. v. Cameron

8 N.W. 99, 45 Mich. 451, 1881 Mich. LEXIS 750
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 28, 1881·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Marston, C. J.

In Flint & Pere Marquette Ry Co. v. Lull 28 Mich. 510, it was held that the liability of the company under the statute for injuries to cattle, by reason of the company’s fences not being put up and maintained, was not affected by the contributory negligence of the owner of the cattle. This disposes of several of the errors assigned in this court. It may be that the modification of the defendant’s sixth request, if standing alone, could not be sustained, but when we examine the' entire charge as given, we are of opinion that the error, if any, was cured. The charge on the whole was even more favorable in some respects than the law would warrant.

The judgment must be affirmed with costs.

Campbell and Graves, JJ. concurred. Cooley, J. did not sit in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grand Rapids & Indiana R. R. v. Cameron, 8 N.W. 99, 45 Mich. 451, 1881 Mich. LEXIS 750 (Mich. 1881).

8 N.W. 99 (Grand Rapids & Indiana R. R. v. Cameron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Geerds v. Ann Arbor Railroad
147 N.W. 505 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1914)
Neversorry v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co
73 N.W. 125 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1897)
Delaware v. Shelton
26 A. 937 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1893)