Grand Rapids Furniture Co. v. Federal Trade Commission

Third Circuit

Grand Rapids Furniture Co. v. Federal Trade Commission

134 F.2d 332, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 3539

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMarch 10, 1943

DocketNo. 8135

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 134 F.2d 332 (Grand Rapids Furniture Co. v. Federal Trade Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grand Rapids Furniture Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 134 F.2d 332, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 3539 (3d Cir. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order of the Federal Trade Commission directing the respondent, in connection with its offering for sale, sale or distribution in interstate commerce of furniture, to cease and desist from using the words “Grand Rapids” as part of its corporate name or from so designating such furniture not in fact manufactured in Grand Rapids, Michigan, or from otherwise misrepresenting the place of origin of such furniture, is .fully supported by the Commission’s findings of fact. Since our examination of the record satisfies us that these findings are in turn supported by substantial evidence the order of the Commission must be affirmed. A decree enforcing it will accordingly be entered in accordance with Rule 20(10).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order of the Federal Trade Commission directing the respondent, in connection with its offering for sale, sale or distribution in interstate commerce of furniture, to cease and desist from using the words “Grand Rapids” as part of its corporate name or from so designating such furniture not in fact manufactured in Grand Rapids, Michigan, or from otherwise misrepresenting the place of origin of such furniture, is .fully supported by the Commission’s findings of fact. Since our examination of the record satisfies us that these findings are in turn supported by substantial evidence the order of the Commission must be affirmed. A decree enforcing it will accordingly be entered in accordance with Rule 20(10).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 F.2d 332, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 3539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grand-rapids-furniture-co-v-federal-trade-commission-ca3-1943.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack