Grand Manor Health Related Facility, Inc. v. Hamilton Equities Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Grand Manor Health Related Facility, Inc. v. Hamilton Equities Inc.

71 A.D.3d 493, 895 N.Y.S.2d 716

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 11, 2010

StatusPublished

This text of 71 A.D.3d 493 (Grand Manor Health Related Facility, Inc. v. Hamilton Equities Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grand Manor Health Related Facility, Inc. v. Hamilton Equities Inc., 71 A.D.3d 493, 895 N.Y.S.2d 716 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucindo Suarez, J.), entered September 29, 2009, which granted plaintiffs application to modify the Yellowstone injunction set forth in the parties’ stipulation, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the application denied.

The IAS court improperly broadened the Yellowstone injunction set forth in the parties’ so-ordered stipulation. This Court previously determined that the stipulation is an enforceable contract and cannot be revised by the IAS court (65 AD3d 445, 446-447 [2009]). Moreover, we specifically held that defendants’ service of a 30-day notice on the ground that no lease exists did not violate the underlying stipulation. This Court’s prior decision is binding because it is the law of the case (see generally Matter of Midland Ins. Co., 71 AD3d 221 [2010]). Concur&emdash; Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Moskowitz, Acosta and Renwick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucindo Suarez, J.), entered September 29, 2009, which granted plaintiffs application to modify the Yellowstone injunction set forth in the parties’ stipulation, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the application denied.

The IAS court improperly broadened the Yellowstone injunction set forth in the parties’ so-ordered stipulation. This Court previously determined that the stipulation is an enforceable contract and cannot be revised by the IAS court (65 AD3d 445, 446-447 [2009]). Moreover, we specifically held that defendants’ service of a 30-day notice on the ground that no lease exists did not violate the underlying stipulation. This Court’s prior decision is binding because it is the law of the case (see generally Matter of Midland Ins. Co., 71 AD3d 221 [2010]). Concur&emdash; Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Moskowitz, Acosta and Renwick, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 A.D.3d 493, 895 N.Y.S.2d 716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grand-manor-health-related-facility-inc-v-hamilton-equities-inc-nyappdiv-2010.