Grand Machinery Exchange, Inc. v. Apex Discount Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Grand Machinery Exchange, Inc. v. Apex Discount Corp.

18 A.D.2d 1073, 239 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3849

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 30, 1963

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 18 A.D.2d 1073 (Grand Machinery Exchange, Inc. v. Apex Discount Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grand Machinery Exchange, Inc. v. Apex Discount Corp., 18 A.D.2d 1073, 239 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3849 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered on October 26, 1962, denying in part defendants’ motion to modify demand for a bill of particulars unanimously modified by striking from the demand subdivisions (c), (d) and (e) of item 2, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Defendants unnecessarily pleaded their version of the contract upon which plaintiff claims. They would therefore have to give particulars of the contract they allege was made. However, they are not obliged to give particulars of the performance of that contract. The items hereby stricken deal with that performance. Concur—Botein, P. J., Rabin, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered on October 26, 1962, denying in part defendants’ motion to modify demand for a bill of particulars unanimously modified by striking from the demand subdivisions (c), (d) and (e) of item 2, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Defendants unnecessarily pleaded their version of the contract upon which plaintiff claims. They would therefore have to give particulars of the contract they allege was made. However, they are not obliged to give particulars of the performance of that contract. The items hereby stricken deal with that performance. Concur—Botein, P. J., Rabin, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 1073, 239 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grand-machinery-exchange-inc-v-apex-discount-corp-nyappdiv-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack