Grand Lodge Indep. Order of Archery v. City of Live Oak

Supreme Court of Florida

Grand Lodge Indep. Order of Archery v. City of Live Oak

177 So. 742, 130 Fla. 395, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 865

DecidedDecember 17, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 177 So. 742 (Grand Lodge Indep. Order of Archery v. City of Live Oak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grand Lodge Indep. Order of Archery v. City of Live Oak, 177 So. 742, 130 Fla. 395, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 865 (Fla. 1937).

Pincite

Opinions

This cause is before the court on appeal from an order striking from the answer of the defendant certain pertinent and material allegations submitted as a defense as more fully appear in paragraphs eight and nine thereof and the Court finds that the suit is ruled by the case of Grand Lodge Independent Order of Archery of the State of Florida v. City of Live Oak, reported in130 Fla. 386, 177 So. 738. The order appealed from is hereby reversed with directions for further proceedings not inconsistent with the authority, supra.

WHITFIELD, P.J., and BROWN, J., concur.

ELLIS, C.J., and TERRELL, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

BUFORD, J., dissents for reasons stated as to companion case of Grand Lodge Independent Order of Archery of the State of Florida v. City of Live Oak. *Page 396

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This cause is before the court on appeal from an order striking from the answer of the defendant certain pertinent and material allegations submitted as a defense as more fully appear in paragraphs eight and nine thereof and the Court finds that the suit is ruled by the case of Grand Lodge Independent Order of Archery of the State of Florida v. City of Live Oak, reported in130 Fla. 386, 177 So. 738. The order appealed from is hereby reversed with directions for further proceedings not inconsistent with the authority, supra.

WHITFIELD, P.J., and BROWN, J., concur.

ELLIS, C.J., and TERRELL, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

BUFORD, J., dissents for reasons stated as to companion case of Grand Lodge Independent Order of Archery of the State of Florida v. City of Live Oak. *Page 396

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 So. 742, 130 Fla. 395, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grand-lodge-indep-order-of-archery-v-city-of-live-oak-fla-1937.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack