Grand Lodge A. O. U. W. v. Hobbie

1909 OK 70, 100 P. 540, 23 Okla. 479, 1909 Okla. LEXIS 378
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedMarch 12, 1909
DocketNo. 2227, Okla. T.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1909 OK 70 (Grand Lodge A. O. U. W. v. Hobbie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grand Lodge A. O. U. W. v. Hobbie, 1909 OK 70, 100 P. 540, 23 Okla. 479, 1909 Okla. LEXIS 378 (Okla. 1909).

Opinion

Pee CueiaM.

It is provided by section 3, art. 7, of the Constitution (Bunn’s Ed. § 171), that:

“A majority of the members of the Supreme Court shall constitute a quorum, and the concurrence of the majority of said court shall be necessary to decide any question.”

In the above-styled cause two of the members of the court are of the opinion that the judgment of the court below ought to be affirmed, two are of the opinion that it ought to be reversed, and one is disqualified from sitting by reason of being counsel for one of the parties in the court below. A part of section 5 of the same article provides that:

“The Supreme Court shall render a written opinion in each case within six months after said case shall have been submitted for decision.”

As the time for handing down an opinion in this case has *480 practically expired, and the court stands as above stated, there seems to be no alternative bnt to dismiss the appeal.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal in the above-styled cause shall be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Higgs v. State Industrial Commission
1946 OK 193 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1909 OK 70, 100 P. 540, 23 Okla. 479, 1909 Okla. LEXIS 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grand-lodge-a-o-u-w-v-hobbie-okla-1909.