Granberry v. State

259 S.W.3d 552, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 363, 2008 WL 707340
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 18, 2008·No. ED 90107·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James E. Granberry appeals the judgment entered after he filed a petition for declaratory judgment and a writ of coram nobis 1 stemming from the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. We note that "writ of coram nobis ... are abolished.” Rule 74.06(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Granberry v. State, 259 S.W.3d 552, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 363, 2008 WL 707340 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

259 S.W.3d 552 (Granberry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Huston v. State
272 S.W.3d 420 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)