Granberry v. State
This text of 259 S.W.3d 552 (Granberry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
James E. Granberry appeals the judgment entered after he filed a petition for declaratory judgment and a writ of coram nobis 1 stemming from the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
. We note that "writ of coram nobis ... are abolished.” Rule 74.06(d).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 S.W.3d 552, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 363, 2008 WL 707340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/granberry-v-state-moctapp-2008.